The Bush funding policy became the subject of intense political conflict over the course of his presidency. Without this information, it is difficult for a voter who is unfamiliar with the techniques involved in embryonic stem cell research to see what is controversial about it.
Recently in The New Republic magazine, Harvard psychologist Steven Pinker wrote that conservative bioethicists like yourself consistently predict the worst when looking at developments in biotechnology.
The number of ES cell lines eligible for federal funding under the Bush policy dipped down to eleven and then rose to a final number of twenty-one. Some such treatments, such as the use of bone-marrow transplantation for blood diseases like leukemia, antedated the knowledge that it was specifically stem cells that made the treatment work.
Blood vessels are made up of how many cells. This is the procedure most often highlighted by pro-life activists who oppose supporting stem cell research.
The chief policy question concerning human ES cell research in the United States has not been its legality.
Some people believe that using embryos to produce stem cells is unethical. In AugustThe U. Is it just to destroy an embryo cell if it has the potential to cure countless numbers of patients. Points of controversy[ edit ] Many of the debates surrounding human embryonic stem cells concern issues such as what restrictions should be made on studies using these types of cells.
The president, notably, has not taken a position on the issue — though he did today say members of Congress "are still going to have some work to do" on the stem cell issue, which could be read as a subtle signal that he would not oppose getting rid of it. In our poll, we asked the same people a series of questions that basically put the same issue in several different ways, and their responses are total opposites of one another.
Ten Common Misrepresentations The debates over stem cell research have dealt with a wide range of topics and issues, from cutting-edge science to deeply held moral values to arcane aspects of policy and law. And since they can make nearly any kind of cell in the body, they have long been anticipated as uniquely valuable for regenerative medicine although the threat of transplant rejection and the risk of tumorigenicity pose significant hurdles to the successful translation of stem cell research to clinically useful medicine.
New techniques for gathering the cells are in quiet development; scientists are generally wary of disclosure, because public reaction is difficult to predict. After all, if the replacement of cells can help an individual to get rid of a deadly disease, who won't go for it.
The idea of cloning human embryos in order to destroy them for the sake of creating stem cells is disturbing to many Americans in its own right, but it also raises the specter, long envisioned in works of science fiction like the novel Brave New World, of using the same technique to produce cloned children.
Preliminary studies indicate that iPS cells have identical capabilities as embryonic stem cells which may negate the need to derive embryonic stem cells from embryos.
1) Taking cells from peope via the bone marrow can result in a painful destruction. 2) To use the umbilical cord, it must be planned ahead by close family members, so that the body doesn't reject it. 3) In the case of embryonic cells, the extraction of stem cells from an embryo requires its destruction.
Since its founding, The New Atlantis has paid close attention to the ethical and political controversies arising from biotechnology — including especially the heated debates over stem cell research. We are pleased to devote the entirety of our Winter issue to a major report on the stem cell debates, a comprehensive and up-to-date account of.
At the heart of the stem cell debate is a battle over abortion — but with a twist. Yes, these are cells from embryos.
And according to the religious orthodoxy, an embryo is life. Embryonic Stem Cell Research Debate Many people form their opinions regarding stem cell research without even remotely understanding what it means in practical terms.
To form an unbiased view about stem cell research and its related concepts, it is important to know both sides about the coin perfectly. But while the research is promising, embryonic stem cell research backers like Solomon say the adult cells are not an adequate substitute, and that embryonic stem cells are "absolutely the gold standard" for research purposes.
What researches then have is a clump of perhaps cells that have split multiple times since day one, says Dr.
Lorenz Studer, a stem-cell biologist with Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.Stem cells debate